Multiple Perspectives vs. Single Perspective Approach Essay

The focus of my paper is going to be Pluralism, Monism and Interdisciplinarity in the context of a doubled survey start. I will hold forth the advantages of taking a bigeminal posture climax of work tabooing things which ar, Pluralism and Interdisciplinarity, as hostile to a superstar perspective mount, which is Monism. Pluralism mint be used as the confines to define the integration of unalike determine and cultures in spite of appearance a given ships company. Monism, ( sticks from a Greek word Monos meaning maven) is be as whatever philosophy that denies that at that place atomic number 18 many separate creations in the universe and instead looks at a unified one (James and McDonald).Interdisciplinarity looks at divergent disciplines, the combination of which sens help wee-wee something revolutionary and diverse. I hold in with some(prenominal) Berlin and Moran that it is cave in to take a threefold perspective approach. Though commonwealth whi tethorn dismiss triune perspective approach, I believe that Pluralism is a response to Monism and Interdisciplinarity, creation the advancement of companionship into something split up and radical in the context of the disciplines that have commodious become outdated and old modality and which gave heighten to some other disciplines. Both Pluralism and Interdisciplinarity ar a three-fold perspective approach of looking at things.Pluralism as a response to MonismMonism as defined preliminary in the paper is a view of looking at the universe as a unified whole, meaning that it is a singular mode of looking at things as impertinent to pluralism which looks at things in different ways, the multiple perspective approach. The crusade why I agree that it is better to have a multiple way of looking at things is because, as the ball keeps changing, societies too change and evolve. New innovations argon made, ideas and ideals change and in that locationfore, we cannot have a single outlook on things. People come up with different views, ideas and have their deliver interpretations to what they believe in and/or agree with. Berlin states there is a plurality of ideals, as there is a plurality of cultures and of temperaments (11). This government agency that Pluralism is having multiple reputes, perspectives that slew can value to a greater completion than one thing. Different volume have different values and we whitethorn not always believe in or agree to them nevertheless there is an understanding of why we as valet de chambre beings, pursuit what we believe in and we may therefore, have some values that argon similar.People may have different cultures that they follow and those that are important to them, still this does not mean that they are not aware of or respect other cultures. Monism is the belief that exactly one beat of values is line up and the rest being false. This is not true and that is why it is better to have a pluralisti c approach as opposed to believing in those who think they know how societies should be set or who know what the ways of life sentence should be. Today we are living in a pluralistic society where people around the globe share their knowledge and expertise with each other.The advantage of pluralism is the geological fault of cultures which give the freedom of communication among people of different cultures and backgrounds, who come unitedly and work together have the improperness to follow what they believe in as opposed to following those who are in authority and those who think they know it all. Berlin sates, true knowledge is knowledge of why things are as they are, not merely what they are (7). In this day and time, globally, we are see a new era rising where nations that had accepted dictatorship as gospel, are now rebelling and voicing their opinions and liberating their nations. Interdisciplinarity a multiple perspective approachJoe Moran defines Interdisciplinarit y as any form of dialogue or interaction amongst two or more disciplines (16). In my opinion what it means is that Interdisciplinarity is the transformation and the organization of knowledge into something new in spite of appearance the context of the disciplines that were already existent moreover have become obsolete. He points out three main aspects that explain sincerely well the concept of Interdisciplinarity and what it actually does and how it has helped society evolve and transform knowledge for what it was hence and what it became. Moran mentions bureaucratization, professionalization and distinctiveness (Berlin, 12). Bureaucratization means a formation of a set of rules and regulations that affect to be followed. It can be give tongue to that this is similar to what the monists believed approximately the people who are in chinkled and need to be followed but he also talks about professionalization where a pastime is off-key into a profession an also speciality separation of areas into discrete areas of concentration.Professionalization and specialization are a contradiction to what the monists believed in because this leads to a freedom of what people were adequate to(p) to do and they managed to transform knowledge into something more substantial than just following rules and regulations that would not allow them to change their ways of thought as people who had the knowledge were to control and were the ones to be followed. Interdisciplinarity gave rise to different disciplines within the framework of a university where students were given the opportunity to learn more and gain new knowledge and that knowledge was not only limited to a few people. We can say that, Interdisciplinarity is a multiple perspective approach of looking at things, in this context the disciplines that were obsolete and that gave way to the rise of knowledge that was transformed into something new.With this came the rise of graphic sciences, social sciences and the humanities that became disciplines in their have got because of the different cultures and value systems that are corporeal within these disciplines and not just one set of discipline that was to be followed. I conclude by agreeing with both Berlin and Moran that taking a multiple perspective approach of looking at the world and view things with different ideas is better than to have a single view of things. This is because a multiple perspective approach brings together different ideas from different beware sets which are more beneficial than ideas of just one individual who is in control and who looks down upon people as his inferiors.Today, technology has advanced to an extent that we can get information on our finger tips by just victimization the internet. Social media such as Facebook and peep are the means of communication between people around the world and are much faster as opposed to the old days when the use of telegrams was the norm. intelligenceworthine ss travels fast through these social media outlets than by watching television, or listening to news on the radio or schooling newspapers. This is possible due to the fact that multiple perspective approach has allowed different mind sets to come up with and share these mod ideas.ReferencesBerlin, Isaiah. My Intellectual Path. The Power of Ideas. New tee shirt Princeton University Pres, 2002. 5-7, 11-14. Print.Monism and Pluralism. Hugh James Francis Joseph McDonald. N.p., n.d. Web.22 Oct. 2012. .Moran, Joe. Introduction. Interdisciplinarity. London Routledge, 2001. 1-18. Print.